文章摘要
张永旭,姜振,郭庆玄,鲁成军,路红彬,徐运荣,吴彬.切开复位内固定与经皮复位有限内固定结合外固定架治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的对比性研究[J].济宁医学院学报,2021,44(3):189-192
切开复位内固定与经皮复位有限内固定结合外固定架治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的对比性研究
Comparative study of open reduction and internal fixation and percutaneous reduction with limited internal fixation combined with external fixator in the treatment of type C distal radius fractures
投稿时间:2021-01-20  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9760.2021.03.009
中文关键词: 桡骨远端骨折;切开复位内固定;外固定架;AO分型
英文关键词: Distal radial fracture;Internal fixation(IF);External fixation(EF)
基金项目:济宁医学院贺林院士基金(JYHL2018FMS13),济宁市科技局医养健康基金(2018SMNS002)
作者单位E-mail
张永旭 济宁医学院附属医院, 济宁 272029
济宁市任城区长沟镇卫生院, 济宁 272057 
 
姜振 济宁医学院附属医院, 济宁 272029  
郭庆玄 济宁市第二人民医院, 济宁 272049  
鲁成军 济宁骨伤医院, 济宁 272149  
路红彬 济宁市任城区长沟镇卫生院, 济宁 272057  
徐运荣 济宁市任城区长沟镇卫生院, 济宁 272057  
吴彬 济宁医学院附属医院, 济宁 272029 wb0902@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 185
全文下载次数: 74
中文摘要:
      目的 比较切开复位内固定与经皮复位有限内固定结合外固定架固定治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月入我院治疗的50例C型桡骨远端患者,切开复位内固定组(IF组)25例,C1型10例,C2型11例,C3型4例。有限内固定结合外固定架固定组(EF组)25例,C1型9例,C2型11例,C3型5例。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后骨折愈合时间、术后Gartlang-Werley评分。结果 所有患者均随访6至12个月,EF组手术时间、术中出血量及术后骨折愈合时间方面优于IF组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组间Gartlang-Werley评分即优良率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 对于C型桡骨远端骨折,经皮复位有限内固定结合外固定架固定更微创、操作简单、出血少,优于切开复位内固定组,但两种术式在术后功能恢复方面无明显差别。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare the efficacy of plate and external fixator in the treatment of complex distal radius fractures. Methods From 2015 to 2019,50 patients with distal radius were retrospectively analyzed, including 25 cases of internal fixation (IF)group, 10 cases of type C1,11 cases of type C2 and 4 cases of type C3. In external fixation(EF) Group, there were 25 cases (mean 53.7±3.4 years), 9 cases (C1 Type), 11 cases (C2 Type) and 5 cases (C3 Type). Both groups were evaluated with the Gartlang-werley score. Results All patients were followed up for 6 to 12 months. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative fracture healing time of EF group were better than those of IF group, and the difference was statistically significant. The excellent and good rate of IF Gartlang -werley score was higher than that of EF group, and the difference was not statistically significant.Conclusion For type C distal radius fractures, percutaneous reduction and limited internal fixation combined with external fixation is more minimally invasive, simple and less bleeding, which is better than open reduction and internal fixation.But there was no significant difference in postoperative functional recovery between the two groups.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

分享按钮

漂浮通知

  X

近期,网上出现以《济宁医学院学报》杂志社的名义制造的虚假网站,诱骗作者在线投稿,骗取作者版面费或收取中介费,造成恶劣影响。在此提醒广大作者,审慎辨别,谨防上当。 投稿警示:我刊对所有来稿均不收取审稿费。 投稿方式:登录济宁医学院官方网站,在左下方点击“济宁医学院学报”进入《济宁医学院学报》网页,点击作者登录,注册新用户,然后在线投稿。