| 李功迎,马洪霞.急性精神应激对SD大鼠部分脑区BDNF及CREB表达的影响[J].济宁医学院学报,2013,(2):84-88 |
| 急性精神应激对SD大鼠部分脑区BDNF及CREB表达的影响 |
| The effects of acute mental stress on expression of BDNF and CREB in some selected brain regions of sprague-dawley rats |
| 投稿时间：2013-04-06 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1000-9760.2013.02.003 |
| 中文关键词: 脑源性神经营养因子;cAMP反应元件结合蛋白;精神应激;免疫组织化学 |
| 英文关键词: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor;cAMP response element binding protein;Mental stress;Immunohistochemistry |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 李功迎 | 济宁医学院山东省行为医学重点实验室, 济宁医学院护理学院, 山东济宁 272067 | | 马洪霞 | 济宁医学院山东省行为医学重点实验室, 济宁医学院护理学院, 山东济宁 272067 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 4805 |
| 全文下载次数: 904 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 研究精神应激后部分脑区内BDNF、CREB蛋白表达的时序性变化,进一步探讨BDNF对精神应激的保护作用及其机制。方法 采用旁观电击大鼠应激模型作为精神应激模型,利用免疫组织化学技术,观察精神应激后海马CA1区、前额叶皮质、杏仁核中央核、伏隔核(壳区)、中脑导水管周围灰质、腹侧背盖区等脑区内BDNF、CREB蛋白不同时点的表达。结果 1)精神应激后即刻各脑区BDNF表达明显下调,灰度值明显大于对照组,差异具有极显著性;精神应激后0.5h、1h BDNF表达开始恢复,但仍少于对照组,差异有显著性;精神应激后2h BDNF表达除VTA区外,其余各脑区恢复至对照组水平,两组比较无明显差异;精神应激后6h BDNF表达继续增高,明显高于对照组(VTA区除外),差异有显著性;精神应激后24h BDNF mRNA表达达最高值,明显高于对照组,差异有显著性(VTA区除外,VTA区表达仍低于对照组)。2)应激后即刻,精神应激组P-CREB表达较对照组明显减少,差异具有显著性;随后二者表达逐渐增多,精神应激后24h时,精神应激组P-CREB表达较对照组明显增多。3)精神应激后即刻、精神应激后24h各对应脑区BDNF蛋白与P-CREB灰度值明显相关(P均<0.05),二者存在明显时空相关性。结论 旁观电击大鼠应激模型能产生明显的精神应激;BDNF参与了机体精神应激状态下的"异稳态平衡",对精神应激有明显保护作用;BDNF的保护作用可能是通过CREB路径实现的。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To study the dynamic changes of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) gene expression after acute mental stress in some brain regions of rats in order to explore the protective effects and mechanisms of BDNF in mental stress.Methods We applied the Communication Box to establish animal model of mental stress and measure the expression of both BDNF and CREB in their CA1 of hippocampus,prefrontal cortex (PF),central amygdaloid nuclei (AG),shell of accumbens nucleus (NAC),periaqued-uctal gray (PAG),ventral tegmental area(VTA) and Dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus (DM) using immunohistochemistry methods.Results 1)The gray intensity of BDNF protein in the brain regions mentioned above of mental stress group were very significantly higher than that of control group,indicating significantly decreased expression of BDNF protein,at 0.5h and 1h after mental stress.However,there were no significant difference of BDNF protein in almost regions (other than the BDNF mRNA in VTA region) between mental stress group and control group at 2h following mental stress,and mental stress group still decreased relative to that in control group.BDNF protein at 0.5h and 1h higher than at 0 h in mental stressed animals.These findings revealed gradual recovery of BDNF during 2 hours following mental stress in the experimental animals.What's more,the expression of BDNF protein obviously increased at 6h following mental stress (other than in VTA region) and reached a strikingly higher level tested at 24h following stress (also other than in VTA region) compared with the control group.Specially,in contrast to other brain regions,VTA region expressed still lowered BDNF but incongruently higher BDNF protein at 24h following mental stress.2)At the 0h after stress,the expression of P-CREB in mental stress group were significantly decreased than in control group,but at the 24h,they were both significantly increased to a level significantly higher than that in the control group.3)The gray intensity of BDNF and that of P-CREB were significantly correlated with each other at both 0h and 24h after stress,implying certain spatio-temporal association between the BDNF and CREB.Conclusion The Communication Box model can induce obvious mental stress,and BDNF can bring about protective effects on mental stress,which were involved in the heterhomeostasis of mental stress.The protective effects of BDNF may be through CREB pathway. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
